IOSG: TAO is like the Elon Musk who invested in OpenAI, Subnet is like Sam Altman
Original Title: "IOSG Weekly Brief | TAO is to OpenAI What Elon Musk is to a Donation, Subnet is to Sam Altman #321"
Original Author: Momir, IOSG Ventures
The bullish thesis for TAO requires you to believe in a game-theoretical miracle. But the cryptocurrency industry has seen such miracles before.
Bittensor holds one of the most elegant narratives in the cryptocurrency space: a decentralized AI oracle market where the market mechanism allocates funding to the most impactful research. TAO is the coordination layer, subnets are the labs, and the market is the grant committee.
Stripped of its narrative facade, you'll discover some more unsettling things.
Bittensor is a grant program where cryptocurrency speculators fund AI R&D—and the grantees have no obligation to return any value to TAO.
You can think of TAO as Elon Musk—he is the first donor of OpenAI, a "non-profit" entity. Subnets are like Sam Altman—they are the fund recipients, building and delivering the product, but without any contractual obligation to share the returns. They may ultimately choose to privatize the gains rather than return any value to the initial funders.
Bittensor distributes TAO tokens to subnet operators and miners based on the subnet token price. Once a subnet receives TAO allocation, there is no mandatory mechanism requiring the AI models, datasets, or services produced to stay within the Bittensor ecosystem. Subnet operators can use Bittensor's TAO incentives to rug pull and take the real product elsewhere—onto centralized cloud servers, packaged as a standalone API, or directly sold under an SaaS shell.
TAO has no equity and no authorized contract. The only tether is the subnet token—the token price must hold up to maintain access to resources. But this is only effective before the subnet "flies away": once the product is robust enough to stand alone outside the Bittensor system, this lifeline is cut. The relationship between Bittensor and subnets, rather than being venture capital, is more like research funding—a grant to kickstart you but without taking a share.
To put it bluntly, Bittensor is fundamentally a wealth transfer: from token speculators' pockets to AI researchers' accounts—or more plainly, from lambs to tech-savvy "miners."
The principle is simple: TAO investors act as the backstop for the entire ecosystem. They buy and hold TAO to support the token price, which serves as the channel for funds flowing into the subnetwork incentive system. Subnetwork operators earn TAO inflation rewards through "performance display," which is largely about maintaining a good-looking token price for their subnetwork. The AI products built with this funding can exit at any time—the only constraint being the need to continue acquiring network resources.
This is the VC's worst nightmare: you've invested the money, the product has been built, but they don't owe you anything. All that's left is a token issuance schedule, plus a prayer.
Optimist's Interpretation
Now, let's look at it from a different perspective. The optimistic view is built on two pillars:
The ongoing need for resources means AI companies are always facing a funding shortage. Computing, data, and talent costs are high. If Bittensor can reliably provide these resources at scale, the subnetworks have a reasonable incentive to stay—not because they are locked in, but because leaving would mean losing a channel of resource supply.
There is a soft support in logic: AI's demand for resources is endless, and the scale that TAO can provide is unattainable through self-financing alone. Following this logic, subnetwork teams would proactively maintain their token valuation, without needing any enforcement mechanism, and the TAO economy would naturally form a positive feedback loop. Cryptocurrencies have excelled in aggregating resources. Bitcoin has aggregated massive computing power solely through token incentives. Ethereum's proof-of-work mechanism has also been hugely successful, becoming a powerful magnet for computing resources.
Bittensor is applying the same strategy to the field of artificial intelligence. The "enforcement mechanism" is the token game itself— as long as TAO holds value, the incentive to participate will continue to grow.
If Bittensor's future were simulated 1000 times, the distribution of results would be extremely skewed.
In most simulation scenarios, Bittensor will remain a niche funded project. The AI AI results generated by subnetworks will be insignificant. The best-performing subnetworks will gain significant attention, seize rewards, and then turn to a closed-source mode, providing no value to TAO. When the token issuance exceeds the created value, the TAO token will depreciate.
In a few simulation paths, something really takes off. A certain subnetwork delivers truly competitive AI services, and network effects begin to snowball. TAO becomes the coordination layer of decentralized AI infrastructure in the true sense—not capturing value through enforcement but relying on the gravitational pull inherent in being a reserve asset of a functioning AI economy.
In rare cases, TAO becomes an existence that defines an entirely new asset class.
Where Things Could Go Wrong
The bear case logic is simple: no stickiness. Once a subnet no longer needs TAO token incentives, it will leave. Bittensor is a transitional phase, not a final destination. Centralized AI holds overwhelming dominance. Companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have orders of magnitude more computing power and talent reserves. TAO cannot compete with the deep pockets of venture capital and private equity markets. Therefore, the best talent will opt for the traditional development path. Inflation is taxation.
TAO's inflation plan subsidizes subnets through dilution of holders. If the value created by the subnet does not match this dilution level, it is a slow bleed disguised as a "growth mechanism."
The optimistic scenario, frankly, looks more like wishful thinking than a realistically viable path to success.
Conclusion
The majority of capital poured into TAO will ultimately subsidize development activities that do not return value to token holders. However, Crypto has repeatedly demonstrated that token incentive-driven coordination games can produce results that defy all rational models.
Bitcoin theoretically should not have succeeded, but it did—even though this argument alone is not sufficient, the industry has used it to endorse numerous projects that cannot withstand first-principles scrutiny.
The core issue with TAO is not whether a coercive mechanism exists—it does not, and the efforts of dTAO have not changed that. The core issue is: whether game theory incentives are strong enough to keep the highest-quality subnets on track. Buying into TAO is a bet that a "soft guarantee" can hold up in a harsh reality.
This is either naive or visionary.
You may also like

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

