The core problem with BTC
By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/02 21:30:01
0
Share
Homepage > News > Editorial > The core problem with BTC For many years now, I have written that BTC has become “a soft money” and attempted to warn a community I once believed in that the path of convenience, politics, and social consensus was leading them into the arms of the very systems they claimed to oppose—one where an oligarchical intelligentsia rules a new world technocracy that is more oppressive than the last. Now, in the spring of 2025, that warning is bearing (more) bitter fruit for the small blockers. A new proposal from Bitcoin Core developers seek to remove longstanding limits on the OP_RETURN function, a change that speaks volumes about the true nature of BTC in its current form and culture. And it’s not good. They say BTC doesn’t change. Right now, they’re all fighting about who gets to change it – again. — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) April 30, 2025 The proposal in question, advanced by Peter Todd, would eliminate the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN output scripts in BTC. That limit was originally imposed, if you believe the rhetoric, as a safeguard to prevent abuse, to encourage monetary uses of the protocol, and to keep node storage burdens modest. In reality, it was pushed almost exclusively by Luke Dashjr to kill off Satoshi Dice, CounterParty tokens and everyone else in 2015 who was doing cool stuff with Bitcoin. “all “standardness” rules are conceptually problematic to the very core” Almost all the standardness rules are either avoiding actual DoS attacks like excessive checksigs, or leaving room for soft fork upgrades. The DoS attacks should be fixed of course – hopefully the Great... — Peter Todd (@peterktodd) April 29, 2025 Proponents of the new change now argue that these constraints are arbitrary, outdated, or easily circumvented and that removing them merely reflects reality. But reality, as always with BTC, is contested terrain, and it’s increasingly clear that reality is whatever the High Priests of Bitcoin Core decree—which is a problem because about 99% of the BTC network is running the “Core” reference client software—a dangerous level of centralization. Bitcoin Core is completely captured. If you’re still running it (~99% of nodes are), then there’s no other way to say it – you are facilitating an ongoing attack on Bitcoin. Your use of the software is giving the attackers the power to carry out their attack. Remove that power. — Bitcoin Lebowski (@DudeJLebowski) April 29, 2025 Let’s pause to consider the architecture here. In the BTC Core world, policy changes begin life as GitHub pull requests, vetted by a small cohort of developers and eventually merged into the reference implementation. If you raise concerns—as one contributor recently did, eloquently and at length—you are told to “vote with your feet” or your hash. Or worse, you are ratioed, flagged, silenced, or dismissed. This is not decentralization. It is a bureaucracy with a command line and a direct repudiation of what Bitcoin was supposed to be. And that’s half the problem, since bad actors have taken over Bitcoin Core maintainership. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) May 1, 2025 The original vision, as Satoshi outlined and as BSV continues to uphold, is a system governed not by invisible developer councils or sacred repositories, but by the free market itself. In BSV, consensus rules are generalized and then locked such that most things are policy rules to be configured by competing node operators. Those node operators choose the rules they enforce, and users choose to connect to the nodes they trust. The balance of power is spread across competing commercial interests, not consolidated behind a single GitHub repo guarded like the Holy of Holies. Lopp was literally rubbing it in our faces that he fully intends to rape us. This isn’t just some disagreement: they are literally committing violence against Bitcoiners. — Luke Dashjr (@LukeDashjr) April 30, 2025 This is the core philosophical difference: BTC is governed by a strict hierarchical committee. BSV is governed by competing market incentives of commercial operators. And it matters. When policy becomes protocol and protocol becomes ideology, Bitcoin ceases to be money and becomes a meme. This is what I mean when I say that BTC is a soft money: it is not backed by consistent rules, or by the discipline of the market. It is steered by people, subject to politics, and vulnerable to moral panics and backroom bargains. It is, in the end, a fiat money in open-source clothing that never actually becomes serious for anything except the meme itself. This is the tragedy of the Bitcoin Civil War, and it is what I’ve spent years trying to explain. Bitcoin didn’t split because of a block size dispute. It split because one side believed in the sovereignty of protocol, and the other believed in the supremacy of social consensus. One side wanted money governed by honest actors, constrained by economic incentives, and flexible as a general-purpose money, payment system and distributed database. The other wanted money that could be tinkered with endlessly by those who claimed to “understand it best” and ultimately beholden to social signalling and constant jockeying of a bizarre mix of political forces. Knots runners are censoring financial related transactions. My node therefore rejects all connections to Knots. Fuck Knots and anyone that uses it. https://t.co/rhhtfFFHYs — noosphere888 #FREESAMOURAI (@noosphere888x2) April 30, 2025 We now know where that road leads: to policy changes locked behind pull request comment freezes. To governance by insiders. To a transactional system where few actually transact. And now to a redefinition of OP_RETURN; not because of demand, not because of competition, not because of any urgent need in the market, but because a small cabal of developers decided the rule was inconvenient for their own commercial needs, and therefore, deemed into the protocol. If that doesn’t make you pause, it should. Because what happens when it’s not OP_RETURN? What happens when they decide that your privacy is too subversive, or that your scaling solution is too unorthodox, or that your coins—mined honestly, used legally—are somehow suspect because they don’t align with the evolving orthodoxy of BTC Core? Or, imagine this: what happens when Peter Todd, the architect of this latest controversy, decides it’s finally time to raise the supply cap of BTC? Can you stop him, anon? This is Peter Todd. He thinks Satoshi Nakamoto did a bad job engineering bitcoin, so when HBO doxed him, Greg Maxwell (disgraced Wikimedia mod) didn’t write a long takedown piece just hours later. Because Peter helped destroy BTC’s usefulness as cash with his RBF work, Adam... pic.twitter.com/3wDJuuglkL — Kurt Wuckert Jr (@kurtwuckertjr) October 9, 2024 The answer is simple: you get forked off the network. Or you get banned. Or you get ignored until your network dies. In BSV, we have chosen another path. Our network is open. Our rules are stable and predictable. Our governance is minimal and easy to understand. We welcome competition between node clients, service providers, miners, merchants, wallets, and users. And while we are not perfect, we are principled—and that’s the part that matters. The way forward is not to consolidate power further. It is to disperse it. It is to allow policy settings to compete. To let wallets and exchanges and miners decide, on the open market, what rules make sense for their own businesses. That is the path to scaling. That is the path to adoption. And that is the only path to money that is truly sound. A sound money must be hard in every sense: hard to change, hard to censor, and hard to kill. BTC has failed that test. Again. But Bitcoin, the real Bitcoin, the protocol etched into the white paper and revived in BSV, has never failed that test. Watch: Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0′′ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen> Source: https://coingeek.com/the-core-problem-with-btc/
You may also like

Interpreting the Ethereum Foundation's new structure: Reaffirming self-sovereignty amid institutional trends
The Ethereum Foundation has announced a new five-layer working framework, clarifying the focus of future development and reaffirming its commitment to decentralized core values amidst the wave of institutionalization.

Interview with NDV Founder Jason Huang: Popping the AI Bubble and the Myth of Microstrategy, Seeking the Ultimate Ace in the Crypto Market
Exclusive Interview with NDV Founder Jason Huang: MicroStrategy's coin selling triggered a stampede, BTC has fallen into a liquidity squeeze, and the current market has not yet bottomed out, patiently waiting for a "FTX-level" iconic panic event to clear.

Morning Report | Former Ethereum Foundation researcher establishes Ethlabs; EU Parliament Economic Committee passes digital euro regulatory proposal
Overview of Important Market Events on June 23

Dragonfly partner Haseeb: The fastest-growing companies in the future may all be stuck at 149 people
The pricing of large models is actually an "AI tax": it shackles large enterprises with computing power constraints, slows down automation, but turns subscriptions into a subsidy for small teams' innovative dividends. By capping the scale at under 149 people, startups can continuously experiment wit...

How xBubble Breaks the Deadlock in VC's Heavy Investment in the OPC Economy
DAPPOS launched xBubble, using the innovative model of "SOP is business" to solve the challenges of implementing AI Coding, allowing OPCs who do not understand technology to create a real business closed loop with zero threshold.

The encrypted unicorn Blockstream is deeply embroiled in a serious fraud case
As a mining note product aimed at investors, it inherently carries significant risks. This leaves considerable room for further explanation regarding BMN's actual scale, use of funds, sources of income, and governance disclosures.

Morning Report | The South Korean Financial Services Commission plans to expand the regulatory sandbox to include virtual assets; the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, ICE, has reached a partnership with OKX to jointly establish a cryptocu...
Overview of Important Market Events on June 22

Exclusive Interview with Strategy CEO: Putting Aside the Sale of 32 BTC, the 60 Trillion AI Intelligence is the Ultimate Fate of Bitcoin
Strategy CEO responds for the first time to the controversy over the sale of 32 bitcoins: testing internal processes and breaking the "death spiral" rhetoric, maintaining long-term holding faith, and revealing how the 60 trillion AI intelligence will reshape the bitcoin trading landscape.

TRON revitalizes the image of the bull, creating a more approachable brand character
From Logo to BoNiu, TRON further enhances its brand visual assets.

Will the STRC issuance price discussed with ChatGPT really fall into a death spiral?
Whether this mechanism is a "stabilizer" or an "accelerator" lies in the upcoming prices and interest rates.

The foundation retreats, Ethlabs steps forward: Ethereum welcomes its largest restructuring in history
The Ethereum Foundation is repositioning itself as a lighter protocol governance and maintainer, rather than a primary core builder.

NYSE Parent ICE and OKX Launch Joint Venture: What It Means for Tokenized Stocks
ICE and OKX have announced a joint venture focused on tokenized stocks, but stock futures are already live across crypto markets. Here's what the partnership means, how stock futures work, and why traders are paying attention.
How to Trade Apple and Nvidia on a Crypto Exchange in 2026 (Without Buying Shares)
What are Apple and Nvidia stock futures, and why are crypto traders paying attention? Learn how to trade stock futures with USDT, how they differ from buying stocks, and why platforms like WEEX are expanding beyond Bitcoin in 2026.

Morning Report | Secret Network loses $4.67 million due to cross-chain vulnerability; Michael Saylor releases Bitcoin Tracker information again, may disclose increased holdings data next week
Overview of Important Market Events on June 21

Kalshi's biggest competitor is not Polymarket
The competitive logic of the prediction market has changed.

The second half of the computing power battle: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger reveals how AI is reshaping the global semiconductor supply chain
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger's latest discussion: The AI computing power battle has gone beyond the single-point competition of GPUs; the ultimate trump card is to comprehensively restructure the semiconductor supply chain and solve the systemic bottlenecks in advanced manufacturing.

B.AI partners with MiniMax to launch a limited-time free experience of M3, enabling zero-threshold implementation of Agentic productivity through full-stack infrastructure
B.AI and MiniMax launch a limited-time free offer for M3, allowing access to top-tier large model core computing power with no threshold.

A company that was on the verge of bankruptcy has just surpassed Bitcoin in market value
In this wave of AI, capital is clearly more inclined to pay a premium for segments that have real orders, visible supply bottlenecks, and quantifiable profits, which also puts the Crypto AI narrative under more direct scrutiny regarding the certainty of value realization.
Interpreting the Ethereum Foundation's new structure: Reaffirming self-sovereignty amid institutional trends
The Ethereum Foundation has announced a new five-layer working framework, clarifying the focus of future development and reaffirming its commitment to decentralized core values amidst the wave of institutionalization.
Interview with NDV Founder Jason Huang: Popping the AI Bubble and the Myth of Microstrategy, Seeking the Ultimate Ace in the Crypto Market
Exclusive Interview with NDV Founder Jason Huang: MicroStrategy's coin selling triggered a stampede, BTC has fallen into a liquidity squeeze, and the current market has not yet bottomed out, patiently waiting for a "FTX-level" iconic panic event to clear.
Morning Report | Former Ethereum Foundation researcher establishes Ethlabs; EU Parliament Economic Committee passes digital euro regulatory proposal
Overview of Important Market Events on June 23
Dragonfly partner Haseeb: The fastest-growing companies in the future may all be stuck at 149 people
The pricing of large models is actually an "AI tax": it shackles large enterprises with computing power constraints, slows down automation, but turns subscriptions into a subsidy for small teams' innovative dividends. By capping the scale at under 149 people, startups can continuously experiment wit...
How xBubble Breaks the Deadlock in VC's Heavy Investment in the OPC Economy
DAPPOS launched xBubble, using the innovative model of "SOP is business" to solve the challenges of implementing AI Coding, allowing OPCs who do not understand technology to create a real business closed loop with zero threshold.
The encrypted unicorn Blockstream is deeply embroiled in a serious fraud case
As a mining note product aimed at investors, it inherently carries significant risks. This leaves considerable room for further explanation regarding BMN's actual scale, use of funds, sources of income, and governance disclosures.
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com
